Court creates exception to no-impeachment rule for racial animus

Defendants have a right to an impartial jury, according to the Sixth Amendment, but state and federal laws tend to prohibit digging into jury deliberations to find signs of bias. Jury deliberations are meant to be private and so most challenges that seek to uncover what may have been said in order to prove impartiality are non-starters.

Today, the Supreme Court found an exception to that longstanding custom in a case out of Colorado: Peña Rodriguez v. Colorado.

Continue reading


Juror Testimony and Selection: Warger v. Shauers

In October, the Supreme Court heard the case Warger v. Shauers. Simply put, the case dealt with the privacy of juror testimony and dishonesty during jury selection.

Continue reading